Tuesday, July 11, 2006

General Breaks Down While Speaking of Immigrant Father

A hush fell over the auditorium at Miami Dade College as Pace, a Marine who was born in Brooklyn, N.Y., was overcome with emotion and struggled to continue reading from his statement as the opening witness at the field hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

General Pace, you are a man.

read more | digg story

Monday, July 10, 2006

Tesla: Master Of Lightning

10 July 2006 marks what would be the 150th birthday of the great inventor Nikola Tesla. For those who could make it, Tesla is immortalized as a statue at Niagara, New York depicting the master of lighting. Tesla's AC became the current used throughout the world's electrical grids today.

Now Tesla is the unit of magnetic field. One Tesla is 10,000 Gauss. Both were great men, one studied small fields, the other big fields.

read more | digg story

Sunday, July 09, 2006

Power in Mexico II

"Algunos de los ejemplos citados: la casilla básica 2876 y sus tres contiguas, tienen 264 votos para Calderón cada una. La básica 893 y sus 3 contiguas, tienen 179 cada una. Y la básica 3177 y su contigua, 274 cada una."

Antonio Gershenson writes the above in today's La Jornada:

http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2006/07/09/025a2pol.php

He is a physicist and a journalist. He believes that he uncovered a program used by the electoral comission in Mexico to fix the numbers, thus helping the government's party in the presidential election last Sunday.

The irregularity consists in having several polling sites with identical number of votes for the ruling party. These sites are related, but there is no reasonable explanation of why each has to have exactly the same number of votes for one candidate. One case is an acceptable accident, but the three reported by Mr. Gershenson, seem more like fraud than accident.

The last word has not been said. Yesterday there were hundreds of thousands of people in Mexico City's main plaza. The challenger asked them to bring ten friends and relatives next Sunday. We may have over a million angry voters in the Aztec capital. Every hundred years or so there seems to be restlessness in the land of the first people of this continent. Mexico did not start in 2000 when the current president took over, and will not end in this year of 2006.

Saturday, July 08, 2006

Power in Mexico I


This graph by the Federal Elections Institute in Mexico can be analyzed.



It does not show statistical fluctuations. The challenger candidate was winning and near the end the incumbent party's candidate overtook him for a final photo finish. That is exciting in sports but unreal for statistical data.



Thursday, July 06, 2006

Power in Mexico

"El político tabasqueño señaló que no hay duda de que se manipuló el PREP, y eso lo pueden demostrar, ya que tienen todas las pruebas. En una elección cerrada, "como aparentemente se está dando, cuando hablamos de 42 millones de votos, como en el conteo rápido, nunca hubo cruces de datos y siempre el candidato del PAN estuvo arriba, lo que estadística y matemáticamente es imposible"."

For those that do not read Spanish, the opposition candidate in Mexico, states that it is statistically and mathematically impossible to have a situation where one party, never more than 1 % above, is always above and never comes down.

I agree with him, even though through most of the night the opposition was less than 1 % above, at the end, the elections authority, ended up giving the race to the current government's party.

It seems that there is not going to be a winner before early Septemeber; by law the elections authority has to resolve this election  by then.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Power

There were elections in Mexico last Sunday July 2, 2006. Up to today it is a tie between the current president's party and the opposition. In Mexico the president cannot be reelected. The six year term is all one president has to implement his or her government plan. The decision on the next president must be taken before early September of this year.

Is there any relevant science here?

Politics is relevant, that is how power is established. A president affects the lives of many people. The question is that if science is an issue in this important event of mexican life.

There are some technical issues related to the election, like the official count update stopped on monday night:

http://www.unam.mx/elecciones2006/

Today the electoral commission is counting the ballots to reach a definite conclusion.

From a technical point of view this shows that electoral processes have not used the most current technology for counting votes.

One scientific issue I can consider here is the statistical distribution of random processes, in most random events events follow the law of big numbers, leading to a bell-shaped curve. I do not have graphs for the election yet, but if there was tampering with the numbers, those curves could be one of the places where one can look for illegal intervention to modify the results.

Monday, June 26, 2006

High Altitude Airship

The Lockheed Martin High Altitude Airship is an unmanned lighter-than-air vehicle. It will operate above the jet stream in a quasi-geostationary position to deliver persistent station keeping as a surveillance platform, telecommunications relay, or a weather observer.

With the solar cell strips from:

http://www.nanosolar.com/index.html

more than blimps are coming our way.

read more | digg story

Large-Scale, Cheap Solar Electricity

"...In fact, maintains Roscheisen, the company's technology will eventually make solar power cost-competitive with electricity on the power grid."

This company will be bigger. This is important.

read more | digg story

Digg Demand too high

Digg V3 is attracting too many users for their servers to cope

Something big is happening!

read more | digg story

Saturday, June 24, 2006

Wave Theory of Quantum Gravity

Kris Krogh has studied an alternative to General Relativity for several years now. He just published his most recent work to understand Active Galactic Nuclei.

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0606489

I see a connection to Álvaro de Rújula's idea for a Theory of Cosmic Rays (cosmic rays note below). If Krogh's wave theory of gravity is correct, one should be able to predict properties of cosmic rays so far not observed and thus verify Krogh's ideas.



Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Flock Again

I just installed Flock. Both previous posts were made with the tool that comes with this new browser. I had a problem with the html. I had to fix it directly in the blog.com site. Maybe with time I will learn how to do it directly with this tool

Cosmic Rays

"We contend that we have identified the acceleration mechanism promoting the constituents of the interstellar medium of our Galaxy and others to become the bulk of the cosmic rays of all energies, and the 'magnetic-racket' accelerators themselves: the cannon balls emmited by ordinary core-collapse supernovae."

Thus ends the article by Arnon Dar and Álvaro de Rújula.

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0606199

The authors claim that all Cosmic Rays observed so far can be understood with their cannon ball magnetic-racket model.

If true, this is a big accomplishment. The Auger Detector, half of which is already in Argentina, and the other half soon to be build in the United States of America, should have no problem in verifying this theory.


Flock

This post was written using my flock tool to blog.

Saturday, June 17, 2006

Princess


My mother was a princess in her hometown Huitzuco in Mexico in 1942. Here is her picture.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Practical Foundations of Mathematics

Students and teachers of computing, mathematics and philosophy will find this book both readable and of lasting value as a reference work.

If you want all the formulas you will have to put some work, otherwise the book is useful.

read more | digg story

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

X Men: The Last Stand

I know movies are not real; somehow I feel like adding my 5 cents. Most mutations are harmful.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060525/REVIEWS/60509005/1023

't Hooft

Gerard 't Hooft posts his results on black hole horizon physics.

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0606026

Sunday, June 04, 2006

New High School 

"For students, part of the appeal is that they're treated more like adults, and in their college courses they get to mix with students of all ages. Being on a college campus also helps focus their long-term ambitions. Tabitha Grant, an articulate 17-year-old who just finished her junior year at Guilford, had dropped out of high school and was working in a grocery store when a social worker referred her to the school. It changed her life. At Guilford, she thrived in small classes with close connections to her teachers. "If they suspect you're upset about something," she says, "they'll pull you in and talk to you. You get people who really want the best for you and really care about you." In the college classes, students are exposed to a wide range of promising careers—everything from nursing to information technology to graphic design. That appealed to Grant, whose father worked in the furniture industry for 20 years before losing his job a few years ago. "He was out of work for two years," she says. Grant changed majors several times, but now has settled on accounting and will head for the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. "I love math," she explains."

I like this. I took it from Newsweek today.

Friday, June 02, 2006

Last day at school

I am at school waiting to be picked up. On Monday I will not be coming back. This is how I feel: I met intelligent teachers, staff, and students. I am glad I worked here. There is something holy about a place where people care about learning and teaching. There are the leaders, obviously more able than the rest, and the rest of us.

But, there is always a counterpoint. I did not find a community of like minded people to grow intellectually here. They are not keeping my services, and I myself am not sure about my desire to stay. We parted in good terms, both with the students that loved the grades they got, and the faculty on staff, that were welcoming all along.

I am afraid I was more interested in sharing my passion for physics, than in actually making sure EVERYBODY got it. Even though I taught to three classes of gifted students, not everybody was equally interested in physics. I fail insofar as not making the subject interesting to all.

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Gravity is not a "force"

Today I received my copy of the American Journal of Physics. I have been assimilating my first year teaching high school physics. What I write here has to be taken as very preliminary thoughts. I want to separate ideas on how to teach at this level, from how I personally "feel" about the experience; the first topic is more objective, and the second less. When I feel more settled about the second I can do it more justice.

I have considered for a long time how to teach modern physics at earlier stages of students academic life. There is a conceptual core related to the human experience with the Microworld and the Universe at large through particle accelerators, and different types of telescopes. As a species we know more about these realms than our predecessors just fifty or so years ago. The issue is then how do we communicate this knowledge to our children.

I start with a direct quote from Robert M. Wald's Resource Letter TMGR-1: Teaching the mathematics of general relativity. This letter appears in The American Journal of Physics, Volume 74, No. 6, June 2006.

"Gravity is not a "force" at all, but rather a change in space-time structure that allows inertial observers to accelerate relative to each other."

How does one go about "translating" that to a high school student?

The way I taught physics this year emphasizes that there are four known fundamental forces. Some students can repeat what I said, others cannot. I have not looked carefully at what they mean when they tell me that there are four fundamental forces, when they do tell me that. Right off, to use Prof. Ward's definition quoted above I have to change my introduction. I am afraid that there are many elementary school teachers that have to change even more what they say.

This note is just a first try on presenting that idea to young ones.

To begin with I have to state as clear as I can, what do I understand by that description. I believe Prof. Ward wants to separate gravity from the other three known forces; namely Electromagnetic, Nuclear Weak, and Nuclear Strong. In my mind I am tempting to paraphrase Ward in saying that neither of those other three are "forces" at all, but rather a change in internal space-time structure that allows inertial observers to accelerate relative to each other."

I am expressing here an speculation that is not only mine. There may be more dimensions to the Universe than the four we are used to; and there are mathematical ways to relate those extra dimensions with the internal symmetry groups associated with electric charge, nuclear strong charge, and nuclear weak charge. Even though this is speculation, it is not inconceivable that in the future humanity knows better the origin of all the "forces" of the Universe. Then what?, do they stop being forces, and turn into curvatures of ever more abstract spaces?

I do not know, but I agree with Ward that we should start talking to students more and more about what we do know about this Universe of ours. Unfortunately or fortunately we have to wait unitl ALL TEACHERS join the conversation. They cannot talk about what they don't know.

Education is our way to bring young ones into our conversations. I for one intend to keep the conversation alive.

Twitter Updates

Search This Blog

Total Pageviews