LJUBLJANA,
Slovenia — Elections in the Netherlands, France and Germany this year
have brought much drama to the old Carolingian core, where Charlemagne
founded his empire in the ninth century. This has always been the
richest and most strongly institutionalized part of Europe. But should
the European Union continue to weaken, the most profound repercussions will be felt farther east and south.
There,
along the fault line of the Austrian Hapsburg and Ottoman Turkish
empires, former Communist countries lack the sturdy middle-class base of
core Europe, and in many cases are still distracted by ethnic and
territorial disputes 25 years after the siege of Sarajevo. They depend
on pro-European Union governments as never before.
Here
in Ljubljana, the capital of Slovenia, a country squeezed between
Central Europe and the Balkans, officials and experts talk about a
so-called phantom frontier that still exercises people’s imagination.
This is the “Antemurale Christianitatis,” the “Bulwark of Christianity,”
proclaimed in 1519 by Pope Leo X, in a reference to the Roman Catholic
Slavs considered the front line against the Ottoman Empire. Croatia was
the first line of defense against the Muslim Sultanate, and Slovenia the
second. “When Yugoslavia collapsed, it was assumed that none of this
earlier history was important,” one official said to me recently. “But a
quarter-century after the disintegration of Tito’s Yugoslavia, we find
that we are back to late-medieval and early-modern history.”
The
Slovenes, governed for hundreds of years by the Austrian Hapsburgs, had
in 2016 a per-capita income of $32,000. The Croats, with their mixed
history of being heirs in part to the Austro-Hungarian tradition and in
part to Ottoman and Venetian traditions, had a per-capita income of
$22,400. But then comes the rest of the former Yugoslavia, which fell
almost completely within the Ottoman Empire. Here we have Montenegro
with a per-capita income of $17,000, Serbia with $14,000 and Macedonia,
Kosovo and the former Ottoman parts of Bosnia with similarly low
numbers. The economic and social distinctions from older, imperial
divisions remain.
Continue reading the main story
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story
This
is not ethnic or racial determinism, since the Slavs of southeastern
Europe have been shaped politically and economically more by the agency
of foreign imperialism than by their own blood and language. The former
Byzantine and Ottoman part of Europe — the part closest to the Middle
East — is still the poorest, least stable and most in need of support
and guidance from the European Union. Whether Europe remains a secure
and prosperous continent, or fractures along traditional east-west fault
lines — with authoritarians in Russia and Turkey carving out zones of
interest — will play out most vividly in the Balkans. Thus, political
developments in Paris, Berlin and Brussels have repercussions far
afield.
President
Vladimir V. Putin of Russia has been active throughout Central and
Eastern Europe, and particularly in the Balkans, using various forms of
subversion, from running organized crime rings to financing
nationalist-populist movements to influencing local news media.
Montenegro may be close to joining NATO, but it is often viewed as a
veritable colony of Russian oligarchs and crime groups, where by some
accounts Russia tried to stage a coup last year. Serbia and Bulgaria are
seen as beachheads of Russian regional influence, even as
neo-authoritarian governments farther north in Hungary and Poland
increasingly bear similarities to the Russian regime. The effort by the
Hungarian government to end the freedom of Central European University,
founded in Budapest by the Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros
after the fall of the Berlin Wall, has to be seen in this geopolitical context.
As
for Turkey, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan won a referendum granting
him near-dictatorial powers last month. The next day, he visited the
tomb not of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, modern Turkey’s founder, but the tomb
of Mehmed II, known as the Conqueror, the 15th-century Ottoman sultan
whose imperial armies marched westward from Constantinople as far as
Bosnia. Whether it is in Bulgaria, Macedonia, Kosovo or elsewhere in the
region, Mr. Erdogan is determined to fill the void opened by a
declining European Union. Lawlessness in Macedonia, including violence
in the Parliament itself over a contested government transition,
demonstrates the political fragility of southeastern Europe.
Yet
it is only the European Union that can stabilize the Balkans. Only if
Serbia, Albania and Kosovo all become members of the union can the
ethnic dispute between Serbs and Albanians truly be solved. Within the
European Union, Albania and Kosovo will have no need of unifying on
their own. But if they were to attempt unification, it could become a
casus belli for the Serbs. A similar dynamic holds for the continuing
contest between Croatia and Serbia for influence in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
There is peace for everyone in the former Yugoslavia within the
framework of the European Union. There is only protracted conflict
without it. Indeed, the European Union offers a world of legal states
instead of ethnic nations, governed by impersonal laws rather than fiat,
where individuals are protected over the group.
The European Union, in other words, is the necessary empire.
I
use the word “empire” advisedly. The European Union has been such an
ambitious enterprise mainly because it has sought a union over the
former Carolingian, Prussian, Hapsburg, Byzantine and Ottoman domains,
all with starkly different histories and economic development patterns.
To accomplish that, the European Union has had, in effect, to replace
the functionality of those former empires. Even inside the open borders
of the Schengen Area, within which European Union citizens are
guaranteed free movement, the union represents a sprawling territory,
governed to a significant degree by a remote and only partially
democratic bureaucracy, with many of its people demanding more direct
representation. Isn’t this a form of late and declining empire?
Yet,
it must be saved — and improved. Jan Zielonka of St. Antony’s College,
Oxford, writes optimistically of a vibrant “neo-medievalism” in Europe: a
dynamic overlapping of identities and sovereignties — supranational,
national and local — as cities and regions vie with a revitalized
European Union for a claim on people’s loyalties. Unless there is a
credible European Union, none of the other layers of identity are
possible without conflict.
I
recently visited the Croatian port city of Rijeka, close to the
Slovenian and Italian borders, when the two-headed eagle was put back
atop the bell tower. “It is a Hapsburg emblem, not a Croat, Hungarian or
Italian one,” a local ethnic-Italian writer, Giacomo Scotti, explained
to me. “It was taken down by the Fascists and symbolizes the local
freedom and autonomy that this city enjoyed under the Hapsburgs.” Mainly
because Croatia is a sovereign state within the European Union, and
working toward entry into the Schengen and euro zones, do the
circumstances exist for such a nonthreatening display of local pride.
Here
it is wise to consider what Yugoslavia was ultimately about. The great
Italian scholar of Central Europe, Claudio Magris, refers to Tito in his
epic travel book, “Danube,” as the last of the Hapsburg emperors,
resembling Franz Joseph “because of his awareness of inheriting a
supranational, Danubian legacy.” Like Franz Joseph, Tito held Yugoslavia
together through a mixture of repression and, compared with other
Communist states, benevolence. Now the states that were once part of
Yugoslavia will find peace and security only through a new, far more
benign imperial system: the European Union. So what happens next in the
core of Europe — whether, for instance, France joins Britain in seeking
to exit the European Union — is crucial to the rest of the continent.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment