When a court has consistently voted in one way for a number of occasions it establishes precedent or jurisprudence. The electoral tribunal in Mexico consistently has considered illegal to have voting booth results with more ballots than the alloted ballots for the booth. In the past July 2 election for president if the tribunal follows its jurisprudence annuling the polling booth results of the cases already recounted the opposition wins.
Will the court follow jurisprudence?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment